Close
Eriophorum latifolium Hoppe

Eriophorum latifolium Hoppe

Species
SIFS: 155400
Checklist: 1017660

Synthesis

Species description (© Flora Helvetica 2018)

Stängel 20-50 cm hoch, stumpf 3kantig, ohne Ausläufer. Blätter meist flach, 3-8 mm breit, ohne Blatthäutchen. Ähren 3-10, ungleich lang gestielt, nach dem Blühen überhängend, von dunklen, hautrandigen, einnervigen Tragblättern umhüllt. Ährenstiele von vorwärts gerichteten Borsten rau. Frucht rotbraun, ca. 3 mm lang.

Flowering period (© Flora Helvetica 2018)

4-5

Habitat and distribution inside Switzerland (© Flora Helvetica 2018)

Kalkhaltige Flachmoore / kollin-subalpin(-alpin) / CH

World distribution (© Flora Helvetica 2018)

Europäisch

Ecological indicator (© Flora Helvetica 2018)

4+w+42-433.g.2n=58(72)

Status

IUCN status

 Least concern (LC)

Anatomy

Summary of leaf anatomy (German)

Obere Epidermiszellen grösser als untere. Versteifungselemente linienförmig am Blattrand. Verbindungs-Steg zwischen oberer und unterer Epidermis homogen verholzt. Leitbündel im Verbindungs-Steg in der Mitte eingebettet. Leitbündelhülle verholzt.

Summary of stem anatomy (German)

Umriss rund oder oval. Leitbündel in mehreren Reihen. Konische Stützen. Grosse, unregelmässige Intercellularen. Epidermiszellen aussen verholzt.

Description

Culm-diameter 2-5 mm, wall thin, radius of culm in relation to wall thickness approximately 1: 0.25 or < 0.25. Outline triangular, obtusely. Culm-center hollow and surrounded by many large thin-walled, not lignified cells. Epidermis cells thick-walled all around. Large vascular bundles arranged in one peripheral row. Small or rudimentary vascular bundles within the chlorenchyma. Chlorenchyma in round, oval, square or rectangular groups. Sclerenchyma belt absent. Groups of sclerenchyma conic. Vascular bundles collateral closed. Sheath around vascular bundles absent or not lignified. Vessels arrangement in vascular bundles in lateral position. Largest vessel in the bundle 20-50 μm. Cavities (intercellulars) between parenchyma-cells small, often triangular. Cavities (intercellulars) between parenchyma-cells round, oval or radial. Distinct cavities (intercellulars) in the protoxylem area of vascular bundles. Crystals absent.

Distribution map (Atlas)

Dataset last updated:
Data is updated once a day, whenever possible.

Simple

Before threshold year
From threshold year
Before and after threshold year

Advanced

Colors
Validated observations
Observations waiting for validation
Occurrences from Atlas Welten & Sutter (1982) and supplements (1984, 1994) without confirmation in the Info Flora database since
Symbols
Before threshold year
From threshold year
Native
Reintroduced
Not native / introduced / subspontaneous / escaped
Doubtful

Number of observations

Below the threshold number of observations
Above or equal the threshold number of observations
Symbols
Valley surfaces Mountain surfaces
Abundant or frequent presence
Scarce or rare presence
H Herbarium sample
L Mentioned in the litterature
Colors
Occurrences from Atlas Welten & Sutter (1982)
Occurrences from supplements 1984
Occurrences from supplements 1994

Distribution in Switzerland (© Flora Helvetica 2018)

CH

World distribution (© Flora Helvetica 2018)

Europäisch

Ecology

Life form

Geophyte

Habitats

Habitats © Delarze & al. 2015

bold
Dominant species, influencing the appearance of the habitat
Character species
Character species
Less strictly linked to a specific habitat
Less strictly linked to a specific habitat

Ecological indicator values by © Landolt & al. (2010)

Soil factors Climatic factors Salinity tolerance
Humidity Value H 4+w+ Light Value L 4 Salinity Index
Reaction Value R 4 Temperature factor T 3
Nutriments value N 2 Continentality K 3
Ecological values legend

Humidity Value H

1
very dry
1+
dry
2
moderatly dry
2+
moist
3
medium wet
3+
wet
4
very wet
4+
soggy
5
submerged or underwater
f
plants living in running water
u
mostly submerged plants
v
partly submerged, partly floating plants
w
humidity moderately variable (± scale of 1-2)
w+
highly variable humidity (scale exceeding ± 2)

Reaction Value R

1
Very acid (pH 2.5-5.5)
2
acid (pH 3.5-6.5)
3
lightly acid to neutral (pH 4.5-7.5)
4
neutral to basic (pH 5.5-8.5)
5
basic (pH 6-5 -> 8.5

Nutriments value N

1
very low in nutrients
2
low in nutriments
3
medium-poor to medium-rich in nutrients
4
rich in nutriments
5
very rich in nutriments

Salinity tolerance

1
halotolerant
3
halophyle

Light Value L

1
very shady
2
shady
3
lighted areas
4
luminous
5
highly luminous

Temperature factor T

1
alpine to nival stages (from the treeline to the snowline)
1+
suprasubalpine and upper subalpine levels (pine and larch forests)
2
subalpine level (coniferous forests without beeches up to the upper limit of spruces)
2+
lower subalpine and upper mountain stages
3
mountain level (beech and silver fir forests, in the central Alps Scots pine forests)
3+
lower mountain and upper hill levels
4
hill level (mixed deciduous oak forests)
4+
hot places, hill level
5
very hot places, hill level (only in the hottest places, typical of southern Europe)

Continentality K

1
Atlantic (high air humidity, very low temperature variations, mild winters)
2
Sub-Atlantic (high air humidity, low temperature variations, relatively mild winters)
3
sub-Atlantic to subcontinental (average air humidity, moderately variable temperature, slightly low winter temperatures)
4
subcontinental (low air humidity, large temperature variations, rather cold winters)
5
continental (very low air humidity, very large temperature variations, cold winters)

Nomenclature

Accepted Name (Checklist 2017)

Eriophorum latifolium Hoppe

Vernacular name

Deutscher Name:
Breitblättriges Wollgras
Nom français:
Linaigrette à larges feuilles
Nome italiano:
Pennacchi a foglie larghe

Match with other reference books

Relationship Scientific name Book No
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeChecklist 2017155400
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeFlora alpina 2004138.8.2
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeFlora Helvetica 20012475
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeFlora Helvetica 20122651
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeFlora Helvetica 20182651
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeIndex synonymique 1996155400
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeLandolt 1977431
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeLandolt 1991379
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeSISF/ISFS 2155400
=Eriophorum latifolium HoppeWelten & Sutter 19822398
=
The taxon corresponds to the accepted taxon (Checklist 2017)
<
The taxon is included in the accepted taxon (Checklist 2017)
>
The taxon includes (among others) also the accepted taxon (Checklist 2017)

Status

Native status

-

IUCN list of endangered species (© Walter & Gillett 1997):   No

Status on national Red List

IUCN status: Least concern

Least concern

Additional information

IUCN criteria:

Status on regional Red List 2019

Biogeographic regions IUCN status IUCN criteria
Jura (JU) LC
Mittelland (MP) NTB2b(iii)
Alpennordflanke (NA) LC
Alpensüdflanke (SA) LC
Östliche Zentralalpen (EA) LC
Westliche Zentralalpen (WA) LC
Legend
EX
Extinct
RE
Regionally Extinct
CR(PE)
Critically Endangered, Probably Extinct
CR
Critically Endangered
EN
Endangered
VU
Vulnerable
NT
Near Threatened
LC
Least Concern
DD
Data Deficient
NE
Not Evaluated
NA
Not Applicable

National Priority Species List Status

No national priority or international responsability

Protection status

International (Bern Convention) No
AGtotal protection (01.01.2010)
BEpartial protection (01.01.2016)
JUpartial protection (06.12.1978)
OWpartial protection (01.04.2013)
SHtotal protection (06.03.1979)
Switzerland
ZHpartial protection (03.12.1964)
BLtotal protection (01.01.2012)
GEtotal protection (25.07.2007)
GRtotal protection (01.11.2023)
TGtotal protection (01.07.2023)
Disclaimer
InfoFlora compiles information on protected species as accurately as possible, taking it from the respective cantonal laws. In some cases, however, it was not possible to use the plant names as listed in the original text, but an interpretation of their taxonomy or nomenclature was necessary. The exact meaning of the categories „completely protected“ and „partially protected“ differs among the cantons.

InfoFlora cannot guarantee that the information on the protection status is correct and complete. In case of doubts, we recommend to look up the texts of the respective cantonal law.

Status by sector of activity

Agriculture-related environmental objectives: L - more informations