Contains:
Phanerophyte
| NO INFORMATION |
| Soil factors | Climatic factors | Salinity tolerance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humidity Value H | 3 | Light Value L | 4 | Salinity Index | — |
| Reaction Value R | 3 | Temperature factor T | 4 | ||
| Nutriments value N | 3 | Continentality K | 2 | ||
Malus pumila Mill.
| Relationship | Scientific name | Book | No |
|---|---|---|---|
| = | Malus pumila Mill. | Checklist 2017 | 252850 |
| < | Malus dasyphylla Borkh. | Flora alpina 2004 | 63.21.2 |
| < | Malus domestica Borkh. | Flora alpina 2004 | 63.21.3 |
| = | Malus domestica Borkh. | Flora Helvetica 2001 | 1044 |
| = | Malus domestica Borkh. | Flora Helvetica 2012 | 472 |
| = | Malus pumila Mill. | Flora Helvetica 2018 | 472 |
| = | Malus domestica Borkh. | Index synonymique 1996 | 252800 |
| = | Malus domestica Borkh. | SISF/ISFS 2 | 252800 |
Neuer Name: Das ungültige oder nicht prioritäre Artepithet (Artbezeichnung) wurde korrigiert. Entspricht M. domestica Borkh. gemäss SISF-2.
Checklist-
IUCN list of endangered species (© Walter & Gillett 1997): No
NO INFORMATION
No national priority or international responsability
No international, national or cantonal protection
| InfoFlora compiles information on protected species as accurately as possible, taking it from the respective cantonal laws. In some cases, however, it was not possible to use the plant names as listed in the original text, but an interpretation of their taxonomy or nomenclature was necessary. The exact meaning of the categories „completely protected“ and „partially protected“ differs among the cantons. InfoFlora cannot guarantee that the information on the protection status is correct and complete. In case of doubts, we recommend to look up the texts of the respective cantonal law. |