Contains:
| NO INFORMATION |
| Soil factors | Climatic factors | Salinity tolerance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humidity Value H | — | Light Value L | — | Salinity Index | — |
| Reaction Value R | — | Temperature factor T | — | ||
| Nutriments value N | — | Continentality K | — | ||
Ludwigia ×kentiana E. J. Clement
| Relationship | Scientific name | Book | No |
|---|---|---|---|
| = | Ludwigia ×kentiana E. J. Clement | Checklist 2017 | 245360 |
Neues Taxon: Von SISF-2 nicht berücksichtigter, stabiler (ohne Eltern vorkommender) Hybrid. Der von Clement (2000) beschriebene Hybrid aus L. palustris (L.) Elliott sowie wahrscheinlich L. repens J. R. Forst. ist in jüngerer Zeit im Kanton Genf beobachtet worden. Diese Vorkommen sind problematisch, da der neophytische Hybrid sehr kräftig und fruchtbar ist (zu Selbstbestäubung fähig). Der Hybrid könnte seinen einheimischen Elternteil, mit dem er leicht zu verwechseln ist, potenziell verdrängen.
Checklist-
IUCN list of endangered species (© Walter & Gillett 1997): No
Species from the "List of invasive alien species"
NO INFORMATION
No national priority or international responsability
No international, national or cantonal protection
| InfoFlora compiles information on protected species as accurately as possible, taking it from the respective cantonal laws. In some cases, however, it was not possible to use the plant names as listed in the original text, but an interpretation of their taxonomy or nomenclature was necessary. The exact meaning of the categories „completely protected“ and „partially protected“ differs among the cantons. InfoFlora cannot guarantee that the information on the protection status is correct and complete. In case of doubts, we recommend to look up the texts of the respective cantonal law. |