Lapsana communis L.
1025780
Species
ISFS : 226900
Checklist : 1025780
ISFS : 226900
Checklist : 1025780
Synthesis
Species description (© Flora Helvetica 2018)
20-120 cm hoch, verzweigt und vielköpfig, kahl oder zerstreut steifhaarig, mit Milchsaft. Blätter eiförmig bis lanzettlich, untere tief eingeschnitten, buchtig gezähnt, in einen geflügelten Stiel verschmälert, obere sitzend und oft ganzrandig. Hülle meist kahl. Blüten gelb, zungenförmig. Früchte 3-4 mm lang, ohne Schnabel und Pappus.Habitat and distribution inside Switzerland (© Flora Helvetica 2018)
(© Landolt & al. 2010)
Status
IUCN status
Least concernNational Priority
K - no national priorityInternational responsibility
K - noneConservation
Threats
Distribution map
Habitat and distribution inside Switzerland
Ecology
Life form
Perennial hemicryptophyte, Therophyte
Habitats
Milieux Phytosuisse (© Prunier et al. 2017)
Habitats © Delarze & al. 2015
 | 5.1 - Krautsäume | |
| | 5.1.5 - Nährstoffreicher Krautsaum (Aegopodion + Alliarion) | |
bold
Dominant species, influencing the appearance of the habitat
Character species
Less strictly linked to a specific habitat
Ecological indicator values by © Landolt & al. (2010)
| Soil factors | Climatic factors | Salinity tolerance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humidity Value H | 3 | Light Value L | 3 | Salinity Index | -- |
| Reaction Value R | 4 | Temperature factor T | 4 | ||
| Nutriments value N | 4 | Continentality K | 3 | ||
- Ecological values legend
Humidity Value H 1 very dry 1+ dry 2 moderatly dry 2+ moist 3 medium wet 3+ wet 4 very wet 4+ soggy 5 submerged or underwater f plants living in running water u mostly submerged plants v partly submerged, partly floating plants w humidity moderately variable (± scale of 1-2) w+ highly variable humidity (scale exceeding ± 2) Reaction Value R 1 Very acid (pH 2.5-5.5) 2 acid (pH 3.5-6.5) 3 lightly acid to neutral (pH 4.5-7.5) 4 neutral to basic (pH 5.5-8.5) 5 basic (pH 6-5 -> 8.5 Nutriments value N 1 very low in nutrients 2 low in nutriments 3 medium-poor to medium-rich in nutrients 4 rich in nutriments 5 very rich in nutriments Salinity tolerance 1 halotolerant 3 halophyle Light Value L 1 very shady 2 shady 3 lighted areas 4 luminous 5 highly luminous Temperature factor T 1 alpine to nival stages (from the treeline to the snowline) 1+ suprasubalpine and upper subalpine levels (pine and larch forests) 2 subalpine level (coniferous forests without beeches up to the upper limit of spruces) 2+ lower subalpine and upper mountain stages 3 mountain level (beech and silver fir forests, in the central Alps Scots pine forests) 3+ lower mountain and upper hill levels 4 hill level (mixed deciduous oak forests) 4+ hot places, hill level 5 very hot places, hill level (only in the hottest places, typical of southern Europe) Continentality K 1 Atlantic (high air humidity, very low temperature variations, mild winters) 2 Sub-Atlantic (high air humidity, low temperature variations, relatively mild winters) 3 sub-Atlantic to subcontinental (average air humidity, moderately variable temperature, slightly low winter temperatures) 4 subcontinental (low air humidity, large temperature variations, rather cold winters) 5 continental (very low air humidity, very large temperature variations, cold winters)
Water dependency
| Rivers | |
| Calm water | |
| Ground water |
Nomenclature
Accepted Name (Checklist 2017)
Lapsana communis L.
Vernacular name
Deutscher Name :
RainkohlNom français :
Lapsane communeNome italiano :
Lassana comuneMatch with other reference books
| Relation | Nom | Book | No |
|---|---|---|---|
| = | Lapsana communis L. | Checklist 2017 | 226900 |
| = | Lapsana communis L. | Flora Helvetica 2018 | 2306 |
| = | Lapsana communis L. s.l. | SISF/ISFS 2 | 226900 |
= The taxon corresponds to the accepted taxon (Checklist 2017)
< The taxon is included in the accepted taxon (Checklist 2017)
> The taxon includes (among others) also the accepted taxon (Checklist 2017)
< The taxon is included in the accepted taxon (Checklist 2017)
> The taxon includes (among others) also the accepted taxon (Checklist 2017)
Checklist 2017 comments
Wegfall des Ausdrucks s.l.: Die Art wurde bisher als «sensu lato» (s.l.) gekennzeichnet. Da die früher gleichlautende «sensu stricto-Art» (s.str.) in eine Unterart umbenannt wurde, erübrigt sich die Kennzeichnung s.l.
Checklist
Status